The impractical musings of only visiting independent coffee shops for a month

Last week, I read an interesting article (which had been shared by a friend on Twitter) by Steve Biggs of the Biggsy Travels travel Blog, in which he details his experiences of visiting on independent coffee shops for a month.  The piece begins…

For the whole of September I only bought coffee from small independents. So no Starbucks, no Costa Coffee and no Neros … and so on! The initial idea for this came when my girlfriend Claire and I had a delicious ‘flat white’ from Campervan Coffee Company in the garden of Hitchin’s Vic pub back in the Spring, but it took me until September to go fully “independent” once I’d stumbled across an Instagram image bigging up visiting small businesses rather than lining the pockets of another multi millionaire CEO.

Let's leave aside the hectoring, sanctimonious faux-economics of turning 'multi-millionaire CEOs' into sneering pantomime villains, for a second.  (That is probably a topic which deserves its own post here.)  I was intrigued.  I like good coffee.  I like supporting small, independent businesses (I am one myself, after all).  I like the idea of doing things which are a little recherché.  But the more I read of Biggs' article, the more I felt myself filling up with a cold, uncomfortable sense of inadequacy; I'm sure that wasn't Biggs' intention when writing the piece, but by the end I was feeling pretty miserable about myself, and about my lifestyle.

Y'see, I simply don't feel like I am able to visit only independent coffee shops for a month.  Does that make me a bad person?  I might visit one, occasionally, as a treat.  But that's all it ever can be.  No, I am stuck – trapped in my inferior life of low-quality coffee from chain stores, consumed 'on-the-go' rather than savoured during a well-earned break.

There is a reason why one of the places I most frequently buy coffee is McDonald's (no, McDonald's coffee isn't the best available, but at £1.69 for a regular latte or cappuccino it's actually not bad value, and I tend to think it tastes better than Starbucks – which a producer I have worked with memorably once described to me as 'just a cup of burnt milk'), and that reason can be summed up in one word: Drive-Thru.  (OK, so that's two hyphenated words.  Sue me.)

I like coffee, but I rarely get the chance to sit down and enjoy it without anything else going on.  I work a lot, and often at strange times of day – I find I tend to grab a coffee when I can, often when traveling between one bit of work and the next.  I have a Nespresso machine in my studio, which I love, and makes working from home considerably more enjoyable; but in general, I have to organise my coffee drinking habits around my working day – I don't have the luxury of arranging my working day around enjoying a nice cup of coffee.

This thing keeps me alive when I'm working in my studio.

Small, independent coffee shops are lovely places.  But they are often difficult to get to, in town centres, where parking is difficult – not close to where I live, or where I'm working – and only open during traditional 'business hours'.  All of this makes them, sadly, rather inconvenient.

At the end of Biggs' article, he sums up the positives of his approach:

1. You get to sample so many more flavours from the many different bean varieties stocked by the independent traders.
2. It feels good when you support a small business and it gives you a warm feeling inside: in this case literally.
3. You’re tasting “proper” coffee.
4. Sometimes you may want “some coffee with your coffee” with cup sizes being on the small size compared to a sizeable grandé from Starbucks! But then that’s the great thing about having the choice. When you fancy a large coffee just grab that grandé Starbucks instead.
5. Value for money isn’t necessarily about the amount of coffee you receive though. One establishment worked out to be 3x more expensive than a Starbucks latté per ml but if you’re getting over 3x the enjoyment in nicer surroundings then it’s money well spent.
6. Purposely grabbing a coffee most days for the month turned into an expensive little exercise but it gave me a much better idea of what I like and where my favourite places are.
7. After a while I had to walk further and further to find new places so at that point I simply ended up going back to a few shops repeatedly, but then that’s how you become a regular somewhere.
8. Oh and “independents” pay their taxes of course!

Apart from yet another sly dig about 'tax avoidance', I couldn't find anything there to disagree with.  But it is undoubtedly a pipe-dream piece, written from a position of privilege.  Like a gap year student extolling the magnificent virtues of 'taking time out to find oneself' to those of us who haven't the luxury of such self-indulgence, Biggs' (no doubt well-meaning) tone grates and ends up sounding smug.

I wish I could afford to luxuriate in independent coffee shops, or artisan bakeries, or art galleries, museums, or any other sophisticated places of culture; to take time out of my day and enjoy the finer things in life; to get on my high horse about other people's tax affairs instead of fretting over how I'm going to afford my own…  But I can't – and instead of feeling inspired, I ended Biggs' piece feeling bad about myself, rather than feeling good about independent coffee shops.

Going Allsoppy

Television presenter Kirstie Allsopp has caused controversy this week by claiming that girls and young women should turn their backs on going to university and building careers in favour of finding a boyfriend and having children “by the age of twenty-seven”, in an interview with The Telegraph.

Naturally, the internet, and the world as a whole, are up-in-arms about these comments.  The idea that “a woman’s place is in the home” is outmoded - and disgracefully patronisingly.  But it is not a crime not to go to university - and it is not a crime to want to have children, even at a relatively young age; there is no ‘blueprint’ for life, and no path down which everyone must go - higher education may be the right choice for many people, but surely can never suit everyone.

Whenever someone in the public eye dares to utter anything which is not absolute orthodoxy, they are denounced as a heretic - as such, Ms. Allsopp is being held up as a symbol of misogynistic oppression.  However, she is entitled to her views - and the choices she is encouraging girls to make about their lives, whilst certainly not for everyone, are as much a valid lifestyle choice as any other.  What is wrong with a woman making a life as a stay-at-home mother - not because it is ‘her place’, but because it is her choice?

It is one of the greatest things about a free society that we are each able to choose - and to promote - the lifestyle choices which we feel best suit us.  We are not shoehorned into living a certain way, because that is ‘the way it is done’; this applies as much to pushing people towards university and high-powered careers as it does to encouraging them to stay at home and raise a family.  Surely the central message to girls of the gender equality movement is that they can be whoever they want to be - that they can make these choices for themselves, and that they don’t have to follow anyone’s dictate as to what sort of life they should lead?

Ms. Allsopp's advice certainly won't suit everyone - and, of course, people are free to heed or ignore advice from anyone, as they see fit - but to castigate her for daring to express this opinion seems (as Lara Prendergast writes in The Spectator) actually to countermand the gender equality movement.